RWS 200 Paper #1: Evaluating an Argument in Context (200pts.)

In “Why Do You Think They’re Called For-Profit Colleges?” Kevin Carey makes an argument about for-profit colleges. Even in the title, the author invites his readers to question the ethics behind for-profit universities, including the various moving parts: funding, student loans, and marketing.

In this paper, you will analyze Carey’s argument closely, exploring the author’s purpose and overall argument, and specifically identifying what you see as the most interesting and important claims. When analyzing, you will also do your part to highlight his chosen methods of persuasion. This includes use of evidence, rhetorical appeals, strategies, and intended audience. You will then evaluate to what extent you believe these methods to be successful.

As we have discussed in class, I would like for you to consider the rhetorical situation (context) of this text as well. Consider the intended audience, time, publication, etc. Analyze the ways in which each author seems to be responding to different values and assumptions his intended reader is likely to hold. This is about context and thinking about the big picture.

In this paper, you will:

1. Introduce the author and the article.

2. Discuss the overall argument of the text.

3. Explain your project for the paper, including a “road map” for your reader.

4. Identify main claims and what you see as important sub-claims.

5. Thoroughly discuss the author’s use of evidence.

6. Explore the rhetorical strategies present (e.g. ethos, pathos, logos).

7. Evaluate to what extent these methods (evidence, strategies, etc.) are likely to convince his audience.

8. Identify the intended audience.

9. Conclude your thoughts cohesively, tying up all loose ends.

10. So what? Why do we care? Explore future significance and the bigger picture.

Requirements:

• Papers will be 4-6 pages in length.

• 12pt font, 1 inch margins, and in MLA format.

• Use specific quotes and lines of evidence, and when doing so, be sure to give credit where credit is due. (Ex. Carey asserts, “….” (p. 5)).

• Refer to your Keys for Writers.

Important Dates:

• First Draft due: Monday, Feb. 8^th for Peer Workshop #1 (Hard copy, full draft)

• Final Draft due: Wednesday, Feb. 10^th at the BEGINNING OF CLASS. (Hard copy, full draft, peer review worksheet)